Dnia Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:26:38 +0200 Dominique Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał(a):
> Well, this last one make sens to me. But I am still thinking at 3.0.5 > is not good. 3.0.4 have been here from a vary long time and this > devel release will not be a bugfix release but add some new > functionality. Why not 3.1.0 in this case? Or something as 3.0.100 > before a stable 3.1.0? I'd like to suggest 3.1.(-1). Firstly, it makes sense as a release before 3.1.0 (from the math point). Secondly, I am curious how would the debian package maintainer handle this ^_^. Thirdly, if you want to put another revision between 3.1.-1 and 3.1.0, it would of course be 3.1.-1/2... -- Tomasz Melcer _______________________________________________ fvwm-crystal-users mailing list fvwm-crystal-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/fvwm-crystal-users
