=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs?= Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:34:03 -0500 > Dan Espen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > =3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jes=3DFAs?=3D Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 00:44:09 +0100 > > > Jes=3DFAs Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Conditionals patch revised and attached. > > > > > > Is it valid? Does it lack something? > > > > > > My idea is to shorten the list of available patches as much as we can b= > > > including those that are evidently clean, useful and harmless upstream. > > > That way, we can ease the process for the rest of the patches. > > > > Except for not updating test cases (which almost no one is doing), > > it looks clean and reasonable to me. > > I saw that file and plan to update it. I just need to watch into it > to understand the logic of the thing. Feel free to give any advice if > you feel that there's something relevant that I should know.
The purpose of that file is to test every functionality of Fvwm using a debugging tool like Purify or Electric Fence. You just want to put something in there that runs thru the logic that the patch contains. > For now, I have a preliminary versions with that file included. Attached. Looks good. -- Dan Espen E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
