On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 09:41:25PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > But I had already fixed the crash in the morning.  Didn't you see
> > the message?  The one that said that "True == 0" in x and I
> > checked a function returning True agains 1?
> 
> I did---I've been running with it all day.  :)

Are you sure you really had an executable with the patch running?

> > > Well that's a waste.  Now I'm going to take a look at your work,
> > > Dominik.
> > 
> > Maybe you can take a look at FScreenParseGeometry?  I'm going nuts
> > with the weird onld logic, trying to find the bug in the new one.
> 
> I'll take a look.

It's really crap that with xrandr you have to address monitors by
name.  Can't we restore all the old logic for the users of
FScreen.[ch] and just sort the xrandr monitors in a way that
matches the old numbering, i.e. 0 = global monitor and the rest in
a constant order that doesn't change when new monitors are added?

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

-- 

Dominik Vogt

Reply via email to