On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 02:13:56PM +0700, Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov wrote: > On 28 Jul 01 at 18:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [SNIP] > > > The point is not cleaning the code, but a correct operation of > > > modules -- > > > do you need a pager on non-primary screen? > > > > I don't quit understand the question. Of course I'd usually > > prefer the pager on the primary screen, but perhaps I wnat one on > > both screens. > > What I meant is that introducing Xinerama support into fvwm2 binary, but > leaving modules still use XParseGeometry() is inconsistent -- the pieces of > code responsible for window's placement should be modified too (sorry for my > not-so-perfect english ;-). Otherwise in the case of the following layout: > > +------+----+ > | 1024 |800 | > | 768 |600 | > | +----+ > +------+ > > too many things will tend to place themselves into the void.
Ah, yes, of course. I did not think about this. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ P.S.: Please keep the discussion on the workers list. -- Dominik Vogt, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
