[Sorry to quote it all, not everyone keeps July threads.]

On 10 Jul 2001 18:57:07 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 07:48:17PM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > On 21 Jul 2001 19:26:09 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > 
> > > The recent fixes in the man page for Solaris etc. (\f...) broke
> > > the bold typeface of the reformatted sections.  For example: 
> > > 
> > >   .TP
> > >   .BI "Menu " menu-name " [ " position " ] [ " double-click-action " ]"
> > > 
> > > was changed to
> > > 
> > >   .IP "Menu \fImenu-name\fP [ \fIposition\fP ] [ 
> > > \fIdouble-click-action\fP ]"
> > > 
> > > The "Menu", "[" and "]" parts of the old version are bold while
> > > they are not in the new one.  Of course this can be fixed by
> > > adding more \fB...\fP pairs, but I'd *really* prefer to find a way
> > > to do that without \f...  Isn't there a way to split the .BI lines
> > > into several?  Any ideas are welcome.
> > 
> > I suggest the following style for all commands:
> > 
> >   .B "Menu "
> >   .I     menu-name
> >   .BI    "[ " position " ]"
> >   .BI    "[ " double-click-action " ]"
> > 
> >   .B Popup
> >   .I      popup-name
> >   .BI     "[ " position " ]"
> >   .BI     "[ " default-action " ]"
> > 
> > I.e. use .B for command, .I for mandatory parameters, .BI for optional.
> > I also think, the spaces in braces are not really needed: .BI [ position ]
> 
> Looks good to me.  The only thing I don't get working is the
> indentation of the text paragraphs:
> 
>   .TP
>   .B "Menu "
>   .I     menu-name
>   .BI    "[ " position " ]"
>   bla blub
> 
> results in
> 
>   Menu menu-name [ position ] bla blub
> 
> and
> 
>   .TP
>   .B "Menu "
>   .I     menu-name
>   .BI    "[ " position " ]"
> 
>   bla blub
> 
> gives me
> 
>   Menu menu-name [ position ] bla blub
> 
>         bla blub
> 
> but we want
> 
>   Menu menu-name [ position ] bla blub
>         bla blub

My own conclusion in July was we should write our own macro instead of
.TP, but looking at /usr/lib/groff/tmac/tmac.an where .de TP is defined
gave me headache. This is learnable for sure, but may be someone else
is already familar with this hieroglyphic language?

And I am still sure we don't need spaces (remember, braces are in bold
or even in different color), i.e. I prefer this bold-inverse output:

  Menu menu-name [position] [double-click-action]
        bla blub

Regards,
Mikhael.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to