The main reason I think it better to find best artists first and only then go to the winning logo is that currently the competition is very artist centric. Take a look at:
http://fvwm.org/logo-competition/logos_new.php BTW, I don't always understand how Uwe chooses the overview image. For example, take a look at: http://fvwm.org/logo-competition/logos/Keran/index.php?no_software_patents=ever I see at least 12 different designs, but the overview contains only 1. Other reasons why to choose best artists first: * good artists usually create good works * artists that created many of good logos (spending a lot of time) more deserve to win * good artists are likely to help us to scale and change logos in any way we ask them, reducing our work and giving the best resulting logo Together with my previous reasons, like a lot of work to clean up all hundreds of logos and having a very long page with hundreds of check boxes. It is ok for me to make changes to the previous suggestion. For example, a voter may choose any number of artists on the first stage and not just five. As for the second stage when voting for logos of the 3 best artists, the boolean scoring may be used rather than 5-base-scoring. So both stages may be simply boolean votes. Either check or not check the artist from all 43 artists. And then either check or not check the logo series from about 10-20 final logo series. Seems simple. Regards, Mikhael. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
