Thomas Adam wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 05:09:39PM +0200, michael.gros...@gmx.de wrote: >> - So, my hint that the whole config is not needed >> could not be understood by Thomas. > > That's fine, don't worry. :) > > But if I ask for something, it's because I need it. If you think otherwise, > that's equally fine, just don't expect my help, as my time is limited as it > is without more bureaucracy. > > Unfortunately there's nothing more I personally am willing to do on this. > I've followed your very good steps to make the FvwmPager crash as you've > described, and I cannot get it to crash; no matter what I try. > > So until you or someone else can get a backtrace from a generated corefile > (and hence prove to me otherwise that it really *is* crashing, and not doing > something else), I really am not prepared to spend any more time on this. > > One last note: I rarely appreciate off-list emails -- in the cases you're > describing, there wasn't anything of note which you couldn't have posted to > this list. If you want to reference config files, you will have to host > them yourself. > > I don't appreciate seeing XMB tarball attachments to this list, and I > suspect the list admin won't either. If you -really- don't have any hosting > for files, I can always provide you with some -- although with the advent of > things like github, the need for this tends to diminish. > > -- Thomas Adam >
Seems that I have to analyze the 2246 lines of code of FvwmPager.c by myself at Christmas 2010 or so.
