On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Dan Espen <des...@verizon.net> wrote: > Yes, a number of people wanted git. > No point in arguing against that. > It's accepted that git out does CVS in functionality.
But I can't recall when on the fvwm lists the pros and cons of moving. I know that github is considered the place to be - but I've also had some nasty encounters with it when things go bad - and other places like bitbucket have greater resiliance - not to mention guaranteed backups!! > You've ruined your point about the config change by bringing in > a bunch of irrelevant stuff. Not exactly, Dan. The point i'm putting across to thomas and others is the perception of the changes - they come out of no where with any warning. That can be a bad thing Ethan
