On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Dan Espen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sounds to me like you are not subscribed to fvwm-workers.
> If you care about things like the repository, you should subscribe.

ok - I will do this. How busy is the list?

> Read the various TODO files.

The only one I can see is this one -
https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm/blob/master/TODO.md

i confess to not completely understanding the rationale for some of
the items there.

> I'd like to see improvements in the way parsing is done
> inside fvwm.  There is so much parsing code that does
> the same basic thing.  A table driven approach would
> be a big improvement.
>
> If the command syntax has to change to get there,
> I'd like to understand why.

well afaict the proposal is to rip up things more than that - why?

Ethan

Reply via email to