On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:33:49PM +0200, szonyi calin wrote: > --- Imre Vida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a > ?crit?: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 05:28:28PM +0200, > szonyi > > I was also not suggesting to change the (holy) > > Format either. > > But i can't fail to note here, that the standard > > does not seem to be > > that very strictly defined - see man of man: > > > > " A manual page consists of several parts. > > They may be labelled NAME, SYNOPSIS, DESCRIPTION, > > OPTIONS, FILES, > > SEE ALSO, BUGS, and AUTHOR." > > > > Please note: MAY be labelled. > > > > Sorry. Next time i'll double check before saying something
Well, the man manpage is not the authorative source for information about man page formats. For Linux, there is the Linux Man Page Howto. Of course this isn't authorative either, but the "standard" we use for fvwm. Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], phone: 0721/91374-382 Schlund + Partner AG, Erbprinzenstr. 4-12, D-76133 Karlsruhe -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
