Hello Thomas and *,
Am 2006-04-24 10:49:07, schrieb Thomas Adam:
> That's the package maintainer seeing 'FvwmGTK' and panicking. For some
> reason, he doesn't think reading the documentation is a prerequisite to
> packaging FVWM. Before he split the packages into fvwm and fvwm-gnome,
> fvwm would depend on all of that GNOME stuff.
And it was me, whose had filled the BUGREPORT against
"fvwm" in Debian. Every time I had to recompile fvwm
for my own use without the GNOME-Dino-stuff...
>
> I've complained about it before, to no avail. My advice to you? Ditch
> the fvwm package from the repositories. Download the FVWM source,
> compile it, and run:
"fvwm-gnome" (should) fit better in a GNOME environement...
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi
0033/3/88452356 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
