RE: [FW1] DSL and Secure remote

[Thomas . Poole]

using NAT on both ends, you will not get fwz to work. NAT and fwz make a very bitter drink when mixed.   Thomas -----Original Message----- From: Guillaume, Reginald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 7:17 PM To: Worldwide Support (E-mail) Subject: [FW1] DSL and Secure remote Sensitivity: Personal Hello there,             Do you guys knows of any "DSL Router Modems" that would work perfectly with secure remote. I've Been using a routing software called freesco acting like a Cisco router using "IP masquerading" and I am not getting thru using FWZ even with all the needed ports (udp259,500- tcp256,264 and protocol 94,50,51) open.               ALL INPUTS WILL BE APPRECIATED, Thanks.