I disagree. Having a consistent style allows you to ignore the formatting and concentrate on the content of the code itself. Differing coding styles are unnecessarily distracting. I used to code in the BSD style, but now I prefer OTB. Whenever I update old code, though, I revert back to the BSD style. For the framework, the OTB style is established and is perfectly sufficient.

I also prefer braces around all conditionals for consistency and visual demarcation. It also ensures that people don't forget to add braces when they add a second line to the conditional code.

-Matt

----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Coding Standards & ZF 0.2


I think what we really need is flexibility, not rigidity, to things as trivial a spacing. It is Good Software Design, not formatting, that truly frees the mind.

I think that rather than forcing half the group to conform -- we should all of us become more flexible. That flexibility may also improve our designs and communication. I say allow flexibility in braces for ZF developers. I find both K&R or BSD style braces are perfectly readable. I think transcending "bracism" would be an important statement of maturity for this framework.

Reply via email to