Correct me if I am wrong, but what I think William is saying is that good design is a priority, just not a higher priority then bugs and other pressing issues.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:56 AM, troels knak-nielsen <[email protected]>wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Most issues that suggest changes merely for the sake of OO purity will > > be ignored in favor of _real_ issues/feature requests. There's simply > > very little, if any, benefit to investing the time to make the changes > > in most cases. > > So good design is not a priority? > > Sorry for the trolling, but really ... > > -- > troels >
