-- Josh Team <[email protected]> wrote (on Thursday, 12 February 2009, 09:33 AM -0600): > Correct me if I am wrong, but what I think William
s/William/Matthew/ :) > is saying is that good design is a priority, just not a higher > priority then bugs and other pressing issues. Correct -- but also that it only makes sense to address it if there is a significant gain in maintainability, extensibility, or performance. Otherwise, there are more important issues to address -- both in the tracker as well as with new initiatives. > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:56 AM, troels knak-nielsen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Most issues that suggest changes merely for the sake of OO purity will > > be ignored in favor of _real_ issues/feature requests. There's simply > > very little, if any, benefit to investing the time to make the changes > > in most cases. > > So good design is not a priority? > > Sorry for the trolling, but really ... -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [email protected] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
