Yanick wrote: > And having the score of previous golf courses would be neat too. >And, and that would be Neat witha capital, underlined N, is to >get the submitted scripts too.
This is in the works. > Oh, and maybe a fake golfer with the name 'winner' that >would alias to the winner of that course? Good idea. > And having a field that says if the golfer was a veteran or >a beginner? OK. >> No, there's no risk at all. PGAS only uses your *best* solution for the >> leaderboard. The only way for someone to mess with your official score is >> by helping you. > > Almost as bad. :) Remember that some of the Perl golfers >here have samurai-like attitude regarding their code. Seeing >their entry substitued by a better one that isn't of their >own making could be seen as a severe breach of honor and could >lead to sepuku (and with a keyboard, lemme tell you that /that/ >hurts) or, worse still, seeking atonement by taking a MSCE course. For now, this is a risk that will have to be tolerated. If the community wants to ruin golf challenges by impersonating each other, then the golf challenges will probably die out. --Dave
