>From the keyboard of [EMAIL PROTECTED] [29.11.07,11:11]:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 10:00:19AM +0100, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:22:54PM -0500, Yanick Champoux wrote:
> > > Somehow, I think Philippe knew that. ;-)
> >
> > Even better, I knew I didn't need them.
>
> I knew you knew. :-) I was more saying "Philippe knows that
> it's not really one operator but a bag o' various stuff (as the
> parenthesizing shows)".
>
> > Do you think I would have submitted a starfighter that looked like this?
> >
> > =(<>=~)
>
> Only if you would have called it "Tie Bomber with a sidecar".
>
> > > So we had the spaceship operator, and now the flaming x-wing... Hmmm...
> > > I'm beginning to suspect that the '@' sigil doesn't stand for a moon,
> > > after
> > > all...
> >
> > That's no moon! It's a space station.
>
> Heh. That's the quote I had in mind too. But now that a Space
> 1999 reference has been made, I'm desperatly trying to come up with
> an Eagle operator. Alas, so far the best I can find is
>
> $wooooosh =~ mm==mo
>
> which is pretty sad. :-/
To brighten up your day - here's the winged moon, which isn't an
operator, but a constant:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
;-)
0--gg-
--
_($_=" "x(1<<5)."?\n".q·/)Oo. G°\ /
/\_¯/(q /
---------------------------- \__(m.====·.(_("always off the crowd"))."·
");sub _{s,/,($e="'Itrs `mnsgdq Gdbj O`qkdq")=~y/"-y/#-z/;$e,e && print}
