>From the keyboard of [EMAIL PROTECTED] [29.11.07,11:11]: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 10:00:19AM +0100, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:22:54PM -0500, Yanick Champoux wrote: > > > Somehow, I think Philippe knew that. ;-) > > > > Even better, I knew I didn't need them. > > I knew you knew. :-) I was more saying "Philippe knows that > it's not really one operator but a bag o' various stuff (as the > parenthesizing shows)". > > > Do you think I would have submitted a starfighter that looked like this? > > > > =(<>=~) > > Only if you would have called it "Tie Bomber with a sidecar". > > > > So we had the spaceship operator, and now the flaming x-wing... Hmmm... > > > I'm beginning to suspect that the '@' sigil doesn't stand for a moon, > > > after > > > all... > > > > That's no moon! It's a space station. > > Heh. That's the quote I had in mind too. But now that a Space > 1999 reference has been made, I'm desperatly trying to come up with > an Eagle operator. Alas, so far the best I can find is > > $wooooosh =~ mm==mo > > which is pretty sad. :-/
Similar to the winged moon - an "operator" (token?) which scares the hell out of the remainder of a list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] qwurx [shmem] ~ > perl -le 'print "foo","bar", [EMAIL PROTECTED] ,"we are","gone..."' foobar ;~) 0--gg- -- _($_=" "x(1<<5)."?\n".q·/)Oo. G°\ / /\_¯/(q / ---------------------------- \__(m.====·.(_("always off the crowd"))."· ");sub _{s,/,($e="'Itrs `mnsgdq Gdbj O`qkdq")=~y/"-y/#-z/;$e,e && print}