It still is "kind of mac"


-Andrew Litt


On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:41:00 -0700, Bruce Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> On Oct 13, 2004, at 1:35 PM, Are Hansen wrote:
> 
> > ).
> >     Take the file system, where every file can have a recource-part
> > ("fork"). The System and the progs store their user interface
> > elements, fonts, sounds, whatever in there. So tidy and elegant, no
> > hidden files or directories - it's all in one file. And can be
> > extended to datafiles too; a Word-document could have the fonts it
> > used stored in its resource fork - an early PDF! OSX still prefer to
> > run on classic' HFS system, but the resource forks are no longer used.
> 
> Actually, they are, they're just in the form of 'bundles'. The
> difference between bundles and resource forks is mere semantics, and
> you can more easily examine bundle contents than you could resource
> forks.
> 
> Also, data files were never supposed to have resource forks; that Word
> did (and *still* does, even in OS X!) is one of the most annoying
> problems with Word. This is one major why people getting word files in
> attachments sent by OS X mail have problems opening them.
> 
> 
> >     The Extension-system was brilliant, so easy to extend/remove
> > single functions from the System.
> 
> That was far from brilliant, it was a monstrous kludge that cause
> endless problems for the entire life of the classic OS. We had
> Extensions Manager because we all desperately NEEDED it, not because it
> was such a wonderful tool.
> 
> > Windows-people still "Oohh!" when you show them the Extensions
> > Manager. And every file with a comprehensible name and a proper icon;
> > take a look inside Windows' or OSX' forest of sub-directories and
> > their files to see the the difference. "NO USER SERVICABLE PARTS
> > INSIDE"
> 
> But the thing is, much of what you see in OS X's 'forest of
> directories' are the unix stuff that's rarely used, and system stuff
> that doesn't need to be mucked with.
> 
> There ARE, in fact mechanisms built into OS X to allow the functional
> equivalent of the old extensions. they just can't break the system like
> they used to.
> 
> 
> >     And contrary to other PC OSs, lots of information was stored with
> > the file (long file names, type, creator, last modified etc), which
> > had to be emulated in easily-lost hidden desktops files on other
> > machines.
> 
> No. Unix had all of this since the *70's*.
> 
> >
> >     As they were in fact doing when Steve Jobs marched on to the scene
> > again. Still with a broken pride from being ousted years earlier,
> > intent on showing everyone that he was still the best, still the most
> > visionary. As was his intentions when creating the Next company and
> > its computer (that never made it in the market). If I remember right
> > he made Apple buy Next, killed development on the new Classic concept,
> > and then based the Mac OS on it's NextStep system. Tata! OSX was born.
> 
> As Rimmer would say "Wrong, wrongo, completely brimming over with
> wrongfulness!"
> 
> Gil Amelio killed the grotesquely complex and overdue 'Copland' OS
> project (which was an attempt to modify the existing OS to modernity),
> and started looking at alternatives, dropping the old and bringing the
> new.
> 
> It came down to two alternatives, both, interestingly, from ex-Apple
> executives: Jean-Louis Gassee's Be OS, which was a completely new,
> largely object-oriented OS, and later NeXT, the company helmed by Jobs.
> 
> At the time, one of Apple's manifold research projects was mkLinux,
> which was a port of Linux to Apple PowerPC hardware using a microkernel
> architecture. (describing the differences and advantages/disadvantages
> of using a microkernel versus a monolithic kernel such as in regular
> Linux is far beyond the scope of this discussion)
> 
> This caught the eye of people at NeXT, like Avie Tevanian, then CTO of
> NeXT (now CTO of Apple) who had graduated out of the CS program at
> Carnegie-Mellon where he had helped to invent the microkernel concept
> and architecture; he'd gone on to apply that experience at NeXT, which
> was a microkernel Unix-based OS.
> 
> (and for a company "that never made it" NeXT lasted for years. They did
> eventually sell a ton of systems, both the original NeXT boxes and
> later NeXT on X86 systems to a lot of industries. Wall Street techies
> loved 'em. The Objective-C programming environment (the ancestor of
> Cocoa) was a powerful 'secret weapon' in the hands of a lot of
> developers. The groundbreaking game Doom was developed on NeXT boxes.)
> 
> Jobs shopped NeXT to Apple, and soon Apple bought NeXT, with Jobs on
> the board as a result.
> 
> Soon the coup that replaced Amelio with Jobs occurred (and there are a
> number of accounts of *that* floating around) and Steve Jobs was back
> at the helm of Apple.
> 
> But Apple had long before decided to use NeXT as the genesis of their
> next generation OS.
> 
> --
> Bruce Johnson
> University of Arizona
> College of Phar macy
> Information Technology Group
> 
> Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...
> 
> Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives |
> -- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock!  |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |
> 
>      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
> 
> G-List list info:       <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml>
>  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
> Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
> 
> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
> 


-- 
-Andrew Litt

http://skinXP.com

-- 
G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives |
 -- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock!  |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

G-List list info:       <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to