On Jan 13, 2006, at 2:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

An interesting couple of reads:

http://weblog.infoworld.com/enterprisemac/archives/2006/01/ from_macworld_0.html

You know, it sounds as though Yeager hasn't paid ANY attention to what Jobs&Co said last year when they announced the move to Intel. "Low end systems first, high end systems last"

Apple's Pro apps aren't 64-bit...they can't be...they run on PPC G4 systems. LOT of folks are using FCP on Powerbooks as a mobile editing studio. Ditto for Logic and music. Being on 32 bit systems isn't going to hurt these things.

These programs ARE helped by faster video and faster memory, something these new system have definitely delivered.

The brightness of the display probably has less to do with design than ALL LCD manufacturers have been making panels with eye-searing brightness at first. I've seen this on all the newer LCD's we've been getting, regardless of manufacturer.

And with the advent of the 20, 23 and 30" Cinema displays, I'd agree not a lot of folks run two monitors with their desktop systems, but there are a LOT of folks use two displays with their laptops.

He doesn't get what the iMac is at all, and keeps trying to compare it to the pro systems.

And, finally, he demonstrates that he VERY clearly DOES NOT GET Core Image/Video when he claims that application vendors will have to go back to the drawing board because they have a "slow" CPU and fast GPU. The whole POINT of Core Image/Video is that the OS handles this decision *on the fly* WITHOUT having to tweak the code. You CAN force something one way or the other, but you wouldn't want to!

Finally, in another of his idiot statements he says:

"As for the PowerBook G4 I have sitting in my lap now, I want out, now. What about the Power Mac G5 Quad at my lab back in Texas? That's a tough call, but then again not so tough. It stays, but come Summer, it's toast, and if Intel isn't there with a CPU that matches it, I'm moving to Darwin (the open source core of OS X) on dual CPU, dual core Opteron until Intel catches up."

He's basically complaining that Apple isn't shipping pro versions of Intel-based Macs despite the fact that a) Apple just released a killer platform: the quad G5s, b) Intel's next gen 64-bit chip isn't shipping yet, and c) APPLE ALREADY SAID that consumer Macs were going to be the first ones to the Intel table, and Pro systems were the last. Nothing Apple has done invalidates that.

Finally, he's complaining that he's going to have to pay $49 to get universal binaries of the pro apps

(woobies, he's going to have to pay Adobe a heckuva lot more!) , then in the next breath says if Apple doesn't have pro Intel systems this summer, he's going to go buy an AMD system, load up darwin, and ..... do *what* exactly?

Use FilmGimp instead of Final Cut Pro?

If your computing needs are met by Darwin, what the hell are you doing using Macs anyway?

More pointless whinging.

I don't know just exactly what it is, this time, but the doomsayers are out in force this MacWorld, in the face of little to doomsay about.

--
Bruce Johnson

This is the sig who says 'Ni!'


--
G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives |
-- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock!  |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |

     Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

G-List list info:       <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml>
 --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

iPod Accessories for Less
at 1-800-iPOD.COM
Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal
www.1800ipod.com

Reply via email to