On my Digital Audio G4 with 733mhz and 1.25 GB RAM leopard ran significantly slower than Tiger did. My DA in leopard benchmarked at 25 while in tiger i would get roughly around 34. User interface lag was noticeable when just opening folders and menus in leopard. While im sure leopard is fine for some PPC machines i would not recommend it on anything lower than 1ghz. Then again this has already been recommended. Just throwing my experience out there.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Baha Ata <[email protected]> wrote: > i can give you one reason... small reason.... Filezilla... the best ftp > program for me on windows and mac os.... simple and relieable... Free! > > 2009/5/29 Kris Tilford <[email protected]> > >> >> On May 28, 2009, at 3:48 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote: >> >> > And my experience running 10.5 on my 1Ghz Powerbook, doing what I do >> > with my computer, it's perfectly fine. >> >> It may be "fine", but what advantages does Leopard offer other than a >> buggy, unreliable backup (Time Machine), and . . . Spaces? >> >> I bet you can't play video smoothly? Full resolution video won't play >> smooth on my 1.58 GHz Mini under Leopard. >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Baha Ata > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs. The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
