On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Bruce Johnson
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Still doesn't change the fundamental issues: IBM does not desire
> Apple's business sufficiently to provide chips Apple needs; they
> cannot or will not produce a version suitable for laptop use.

There's that ... but no one has mentioned the fact that IBM is not
just a supplier of PowerPC chips, but also a consumer. Unless things
have changed drastically since I left, the PowerPC is the CPU in a
number of IBM products.

I'm sure part of the reason Apple switched to Intel is because Intel
is only interested in selling chips and will work to ensure Apple gets
a certain amount of preference. IBM is happy to have someone to sell
"extra" capacity chips to, but if there's ever a crunch in
availability guess who's going to get priority in delivery?

There's also the fact that by switching to Intel CPU's Apple enabled
folks who need to run a Windows app for one reason or another to do so
on a Mac. This is yet another way to nibble away at MS dominance of
the market.

If you look for the one single reason why Apple switched I think
you'll always come up empty. This is particularly true if you adopt
the POV of a customer rather than a maker of computers. While the
Intel mobile chips for laptops was probably a major reason, I think it
was probably also a host of other little reasons. None of them would
be compelling enough on their own to motivate a switch. But when they
were all added up, it was apparently compelling enough to convince
Steve J.

-irrational john

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to