Personally, I don't give a damn. What is annoying is over 100 messages debating 
it eating my time and bandwidth. 

Mikeal Palulis 
Kallisti Medias

On Jul 18, 2010, at 11:36 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> 
> Dan wrote:
> 
>> Remember that the purpose of these LEM mailing lists is TECHNICAL
>> SUPPORT, not pretty animated icon cutsie email chatty please pass the
>> nail polish.
>> 
>> I don't speak for the other techies on these lists... but wading thru
>> HTML-based emails, just like TOP POSTED and UNTRIMMED messages, is a
>> WASTE of my time.  My time is very limited.  I can view a couple of
>> pretty emails, and get lost in all the formatting added by each
>> replier, and botched along the way...  Or I can quickly go thru whole
>> threads of well-formatted plain text - and provide technical answers.
>> Remember the part about the purpose of these lists????
>> 
>> Frankly, if you're dying to send pretty messages then go find a
>> service that's Forum based.  Myself, I'll continue to hit cmd-D as
>> soon as I open a gaudy POS HTML email on these groups.
> 
> I agree with Dan.  I do not provide nearly as much help as he does,
> but if I must wade through html garbage, I will not even bother to
> read the list any more.
> 
> What does HTML really gain anyone in email?   As far as I can tell it
> is purposeless.   Plain text is perfectly suited to email.  There is
> absolutely zero reason html should even be supported in emails except
> the stupidity of whichever email client programmer first added it in a
> fit of moronic feature creep.
> 
> And you are much more secure if you refuse to interpret html in email
> messages.   My clients will never be allowed to interpret html.
> 
> Some have called plain text outmoded.   I say  rather it was field
> tested.  Folks on the internet spent a couple of decades establishing
> that well edited quoted text, bottom posting and plain text work most
> efficiently to facilitate clear communications.   Some times old stuff
> is also stuff that was actually wisely established and it is old
> because it works really really well.
> 
> Jeff Walther
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
> those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power 
> Macs.
> The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
> guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list

Reply via email to