<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email#Header_fields>
<http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html>  Section 3.6.4
<http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4685.txt>

Note the In-Reply-To: header that contains the Message-ID: information from the 
message being replied to.

A recursive train of those headers gives mail software, especially lists, a way 
to make a collected display of threaded topics. Done that way there is no 
confusion when someone corrects a spelling error in a subject line or adds 
something like Re:, [G3-G5] or Antwort to a subject.

It's true that there are mail clients that don't follow the rules or have 
other, but unique to a particular software company, techniques.

This message will refer to:
    Message-ID: <[email protected]>
when it is sent.

2. a. "To steal from as if by hijacking." seems to me to fit the description of 
the problem quite well.

It's probably better to accuse the poster who needs to learn the right way by 
referring to a hijacking than to call him a thief.

Better would be to call his attention to the rules as stated above. And, if his 
software doesn't do it for him, to propose a better client.  It would be 
interesting if all mail clients showed the In-Reply_To: headers that they are 
creating before they allow pushing the SEND button. But that would be much too 
confusing for the "average" user.  Sigh.

It would be possible for list software to enforce the rules by simply 
installing the old Subject: header from the message being replied to. At least 
it would cause the hijackers to complain and that would be a teaching 
opportunity. They would declare the list a hijacker for stealing their subject 
text.

-- 

--> A fair tax is one that you pay but I don't <--

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list

Reply via email to