Il giorno 8-11-2011 1:24, Stephen Conrad ha scritto: > A Ha! I found a card with a logo on it and on a chip that says 'Graphics > by Rage 128' and on the chip it also says: > Rage 128 GL This is old! I mean, antique! ;-D
You better forget about it, unless you're using it for a Mac pre-G era (like an 8600 or 7200). And it would be slow even there. > *NVIDIA GeForce4 MX:* > VRAM (Total): 32 MB > > and > > Power Mac ATI Rage 128 16MB (VGA) (PCI) Video Card > 16 MB of video RAM > > Less VRAM in the other card which might be an issue. Apart from the skimpy VRam, the Rage 128 is much older than the GF 4 MX. I mean, like two or three generations before the GeForce 4. Even with a lousy card like the GF 4 MX, there's no comparison. And... 32MB? :-D Do you know nowadays, new video cards have usually 512MB or 1GB? This should show you how "left behind" a video card with 32MB is... Personally, I won't consider anything below 128 MB VRam (unless we're talking about a "retro-computing" machine). But I'm into videogames... :-) -- You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs. The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml To post to this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list
