Jonas Ådahl wrote:
Nikos Kouremenos wrote:I did a fresh checkout, will monitor memory usage again for some of days then :)On 3/11/06, Jonas Ådahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi, I'm running the latest (atleast not more than a couple of days old) SVNcode, and I've noticed some really bad memory issues [1]. As you can see in the graph something is happening between 10h and 15h and somewhere at32h. I didn't do anything with the client at 32h. I suspect that it doesn't have anything to do with what I do with the client, since I was sleeping from ~28h to 35h :P.hoh that's interesting unless you sleap walk (or I should say sleap use-ur-computer) can you try svn up, which remove psyco which results in Gajim using less memory? (and hopefully using it better) and tell us if the results remain.btw, how did you keep those stats and how did you produce from them the graph?thanks a lotThe stats were generated fairly simple. I just ran this:while [ 1 ] ; do ps -eo pid,rss|grep 25204|awk '{ print $2 ; } ' >> GAJIMlogg ; sleep 1h; done where 25204 is the PID of the python process running gajim.py and "rss" is (taken from man ps) "resident set size, the non-swapped physical memory that atask has used (in kiloBytes)".This will create a file with the number of kiloBytes the process is using on each line. Then I use this file, doing some regexp magic, and then creating a matlab script that plots the data:x=[0:length(y)-1]; plot(x,y); where y is the 1-dim-matrix containing the values from the ps output.
Hi,The new graph [1] seems much better! Would be interesting to know what makes it jump from around 50-55 MB to almost 85MB.
/Jonas [1] http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/~tox/gajimlogg2.png
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
