Hello On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 09:24:33PM +0100, Nico Gulden wrote: > recently we had a discussion about DVCS in Gajim's groupchat. > > I vote for switching from SVN to DVCS and below I want to outline why. Because > Gajim is mostly implemented in Python, I guess Mercurial (hg) [1] could be > the best > choice.
First, I'm not a gajim developer, I just poke to code that runs on my machine from time to time, so my preferences have really low importance. I agree that DVCS is better. However, I prefer git (first, it seems to have faster response, second, I know it much better). I guess git is more familiar to much more developers than hg. Psi used darcs for a while and they found out it is a problem to some of the potential developers. But as I say, I'm not a developer of gajim, so do not take this as a vote, please. With regards -- How many Lisp programmers does it take to change a light bulb? (((H)mmm,) (I'm ((not) sure, better))) (find (out))... Michal 'vorner' Vaner
pgpSjSWLBtC2i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org http://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
