Ryan: I didn't understand Usha's question the same way you did. I agree that it's useful to run workflows in a more automated way.
I have not run workflows using the Galaxy API yet, but I did see some documentation on it and plan to try it soon. http://wiki.g2.bx.psu.edu/Learn/API/Examples Maybe someone with more expertise has something more to say about this. Brad -- Brad Langhorst New England Biolabs [email protected] From: Ryan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:25:44 -0500 To: Brad Langhorst <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Usha Reddy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [galaxy-dev] galaxy command line On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Langhorst, Brad <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Usha: Galaxy is essentially a wrapper around other command line tools. So, while you could probably extract some of its pieces to run on the command line, I don't know why you would want to. I would argue it would be beneficial to invoke pipelines from the command line instead of being forced to use the web-based interface. command line is beneficial for large #'s of datasets that need to be analyzed. Ryan
___________________________________________________________ Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
