I'm using Galaxy on a ROCKS cluster. I installed Galaxy on the headnode.
I'm using PBS instead of SGE though. It shouldn't make a difference.
I haven't thought about deploying Galaxy as a Roll if that's what you are
referring to. Only because Galaxy doesn't need to run on all the nodes, it
only needs a web server. You could make a roll and deploy it on the head
node only, but that just seems to be more work than necessary. Its not be
a bad idea if the roll is pre-configured and includes all the production
tweaks...would have saved me 2-3 weeks of work, potentially. But now that
its installed, I'm not going to go back and build a roll out of it.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Derrick LIN <klin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Is there anyone has actually setup galaxy on a Rocks based cluster?
> I know that galaxy should be hosted on a submission host so that it can
> submit jobs to the cluster.
> Rocks provides preconfigured DRM such as SGE, so I start thinking if
> galaxy host should be deployed and managed by Rocks (e.g. as a Login
> Appliance in Rocks' term).
> Sorry if this is not a pure galaxy issue, but I guess people in here will
> be more appropriate to answer this.
> Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
> in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
> and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: