On Apr 4, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Langhorst, Brad wrote:

> I'm no authority... but given that nobody else has replied yet I'll give my 
> opinion.
> I think I would approach the directory problem with a wrapper script that 
> takes arguments for each of the components needed by the tool.
> The script could lay out the various files as expected in the working 
> directory and call the script. I think that's cleaner than expecting users to

Sorry - that should read "call the tool" not "call the script" (stack too 
deep... )


Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:


Reply via email to