On Apr 4, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Langhorst, Brad wrote: > I'm no authority... but given that nobody else has replied yet I'll give my > opinion. > > I think I would approach the directory problem with a wrapper script that > takes arguments for each of the components needed by the tool. > The script could lay out the various files as expected in the working > directory and call the script. I think that's cleaner than expecting users to
Sorry - that should read "call the tool" not "call the script" (stack too deep... ) Brad ___________________________________________________________ Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
