On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Nicola Soranzo <sora...@crs4.it> wrote:
> Il giorno mar, 19/02/2013 alle 20.38 +0000, Peter Cock ha scritto:
>> The current minimal implementation you sent me for BLAST+
>> would be an excellent start. Things like data type sniffers etc
>> would be a nice to have feature, but can be added later I think.
>> And the sooner this gets into the Galaxy core, the sooner we
>> can use it in the BLAST+ wrappers :)
> Before proceeding on this route, one question: we are going to introduce
> a dependency for blast_datatypes/ncbi_blast_plus on a future galaxy
> release, is it ok?

I would just wait a few weeks after the new datatypes have
been released in a stable Galaxy release before making the
new usage within the BLAST tools public on the ToolShed.
Not perfect, but simple.

> I don't think it is possible to express such dependency in a
> repository_dependencies.xml file yet.

I don't think we can declare a dependency on a version of Galaxy
itself - but that is a nice idea.

Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:


Reply via email to