On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Carlos Borroto
> <carlos.borr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I did an extra test. Started with a clean 'galaxy-dist'. This time
>> both repositories fail with the same error. I guess before something
>> was cached for the repository with version 0.1.4.
>> I used biopython repository as a guide to write my tool dependency 
>> definition:
>> http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/biopython/package_biopython_1_61
>> I can confirm biopython repository is failing to install for me with
>> exactly the same error. I wonder if a recently addition in the test
>> toolshed broke the treatment of "prior_installation_required".
>> Thanks,
>> Carlos
> Could be - note that currently Biopython isn't currently
> installing properly on the Test Tool Shed due to ALTAS
> failing (a requirement of NumPy which is a requirement
> of Biopython). Dave and Bjoern are I think looking at this
> already...

Hi Peter,

When I install my repository which has package_biopython_1_61 as a
dependency,  package_atlas_3_10 and package_lapack_3_4 show as
"Installed, missing tool dependencies"(Grey). However
package_biopython_1_61 shows as "Installed"(Green) and as far as I can
tell everything is working with the tools depending on my repository.

Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:

Reply via email to