On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Greg Von Kuster <g...@bx.psu.edu> wrote: > > Hello Peter, > > On Feb 21, 2014, at 4:53 AM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> Yesterday I made a small tweak to the BLAST+ packages >> to fix a bash syntax error in the fall back action: >> >> https://github.com/peterjc/galaxy_blast/commit/4b2fa1fbf485c4630cb6dc0beaf7286cb103bd71 >> >> The BLAST+ 2.2.27 package seems to have no test results at all. >> > > The above issue was due to a bug that was introduced > into the install and test framework late yesterday, causing > the test to not run at all. The bug has been corrected in > preparation for tonight's test run. The Test environment > entry for the above repository was produced by the > preparation script. > >> However, the BLAST+ 2.2.28 package has this strange >> unicode error: >> >> Automated tool test results >> ... >> Error >> 'unicode' object has no attribute 'get' >> >> And similarly for BLAST+ 2.2.29, >> ... >> Error >> 'unicode' object has no attribute 'get' >> >> This is puzzling, since the changes I made to the >> packages seemed innocuous - making me wonder >> if something changed in the Test Tool Shed itself? > > The above 2 issues were the result of a bug in the Install > and Test Framework that was exposed only with the > changes you made to you repositories. The bug resulted > in invalid information being included in the test results > database column, and the "unicode object has not attribute > get" error you're seeing above is due to the exception > handling for displaying the invalid data in the Tool Shed > repository's Test runs container. We've corrected the data > in the database as well as the bug that produced it, so > tonight's test run should not result in this behaviour for > these repositories. > > Thanks very much! > > Greg Von Kuster
Hi Greg, Good progress - no sign of the unicode error :) I now have the following three repositories shown under "Latest revision: installation errors" http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/peterjc/ncbi_blast_plus (Seems to list both a failed and a successful BLAST+ 2.2.29 install?) http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/iuc/package_blast_plus_2_2_26 (No error?) http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/iuc/package_blast_plus_2_2_28 (No error?) On the other hand, http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/iuc/package_blast_plus_2_2_27 (No test/install results?) http://testtoolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/iuc/package_blast_plus_2_2_29 Looks good. So it seems there is still something not quite right here... Thanks, Peter ___________________________________________________________ Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/
