Hi,
Not only that activision has recently released all the Atari games in 
new packaging, with new tv consoles, and you know what? They sold like 
crazy. Never mind Asteroids, Pacman, Dig Dug, Galaxian, etc are 25 year 
old games. People still like them, and they are exactly the way they 
were in the 1980's.
Again age has nothing to do with replay value and interest in a game.


Charles Rivard wrote:
> The key is, the game came out in the eighties for! the! sighted! player!  We 
> are a new generation of gamers who have never had the opportunity to play 
> the original game due to not being able to see what happens.  The game is 
> not 25 or more years old to us.  You are seeing the age of the game rather 
> than the value of it to people who have never played it.  I know people who 
> are in their early thirties who really like music by The Beatles that came 
> out around 1964 because they haven't heard it before.  They could not care 
> less that the music originated some 40 years ago.  It is a new experience to 
> them, they have never heard it previously, and, regardless of it's age, the 
> music is of good quality, and they like it.  The same principle applies 
> here.  And how do you know that this game we're discussing has no or little 
> replay value.  It hasn't even been made available in its entirety yet.  How 
> about giving Tom a chance??  It's only fair, right?  You need something to 
> play before you say that it has no replay value.
>   


_______________________________________________
Gamers mailing list .. [email protected]
To unsubscribe send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can visit
http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org to make
any subscription changes via the web.

Reply via email to