Hi Lukas, In your post you stated there have been several good 3D games for the blind written. You mind naming me a few? To my knolege there are none in the accessible games market. Keep in mind that I am not talking virtual 3D audio. I am talking fully 3d. That means you have six, I repeat six directions of movement including: left, right, forward, back, up, and down. In other words everything is drawn to true shape, skale, and you can move in any direction a human can. I have seen on this list people eroniously call Shades of Doom a 3D game. While it has a virtual 3D audio emulation your movement is still only 2D. You can move left, right, forward, and back. You do not have any upward or downward motion. Such as having to jump up and catch a rope and climb up it. You also cant jump down in to a pit and grab say a gem, and them jump out on to the surface.
Neo wrote: > Why couldn't a side scroller have enough replay value? I tend to agree with > most folks here who are for the side scroller option. Although I love the 3D > concept a lot and this new Angela character reminds me of the famous Tomb > Raider and my favourite Lara Croft so much, and although I don't have any > real relation to the original (old) Montezuma's Revenge, I still prefer the > side scroller option cause there have already been several rather good and > complex 3D games while we have only one side scroller that's atractive and > funny, but it's still just one. :-) > As most people said, when you release the original Monty as intended, you > can do some 3D version later on if ya like. Just my thoughts. > Thanks, > Lukas > _______________________________________________ Gamers mailing list .. [email protected] To unsubscribe send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can visit http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org to make any subscription changes via the web.
