Isn't that the purpose of a blog? Put what you want, as you choose to, unsensored, up there. If people don't like it, they don't have to keep reading. -- If guns cause crime, then pencils cause misspelled words. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Che" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gamers Discussion list" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 12:50 PM Subject: Re: [Audyssey] reviewing games, and blogging
> I think a potential blog should be viewed differently than this list as > far as content rules go. > Blogs are only viewed when the user wants to view them, if the content is > offensive, then they can just choose not to view that blog, therefore I > don't see the need to restrict blog content. > Blogs are great just for that reason, a person can post what they want > and > develop a viewership based on their views. It is like television, if you > don't like the obscene language and violence of the Sopranos, then change > the channel, no problem. > I for one won't be doing a blog if it is going to be censored. For me, > it > is one thing to have restrictions on an email list where everyone > subscribed > gets what is posted, but a blog is something totally different and should > be > a platform for the writer of that blog to write what they want, no matter > how stupid or immature it might be. > Just my two Lincolns worth. > Later, > Che > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Thomas Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Gamers Discussion list" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 11:08 AM > Subject: Re: [Audyssey] reviewing games, and blogging > > >> Hi Raul, >> I do like the idea of a blog, but it would have to be monitored from >> time to time to make sure the content remains clean and viewable by all >> readers. >> Given the distressing nature of this list The last few weeks I'm not >> sure everyone can abide by all those rules. >> For example, take a game like the Audio Formula 1 game that seams to be >> widely unpopular on list. There is a way to constructively state why you >> didn't like that game, and there is the way which was expressed by allot >> of listers like calling it crap, total worthless piece of junk, bla. >> Even though I might personally agree with that view the developer of the >> game will likely feel flamed rather than cunstructively given good >> reasons why it was not widely recieved. That is the point of a review to >> give feedback the reason why or why not it was recieved. >> If someone wrote a negative review of say Montezuma's Revenge I'd like >> to at least be given the reasons for dislike. For example, it didn't >> offer the end user enough replay value, stuff is not random enough, etc. >> Those kinds of cunstructive critisisms will allow me as a developer to >> either upgrade the game with those features, or create more future games >> including those changes. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gamers mailing list .. [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can >> visit >> http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org to make >> any subscription changes via the web. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Gamers mailing list .. [email protected] > To unsubscribe send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can > visit > http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org to make > any subscription changes via the web. > _______________________________________________ Gamers mailing list .. [email protected] To unsubscribe send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can visit http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org to make any subscription changes via the web.
