On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Iustin Pop <ius...@google.com> wrote: > I am very very unhappy with this patch. We have to do this, in order > to be compatible with the Python code and behaviour, but there's lots > of duplication; both the Python and the Haskell code will need to be > cleaned up and simplified (we don't need QFF_* at all). > > For now though, this implements QffTimestamp and associated code. > > Signed-off-by: Iustin Pop <ius...@google.com>
What's QFF (sorry for not remembering) and why are we implementing instead of removing it, if we don't need it? Thanks, Guido
