LGTM, since the discussion about removing QFF is going to happen later, anyway.

Thanks,

Guido

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Iustin Pop <ius...@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:28:29AM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote:
>> I am very very unhappy with this patch. We have to do this, in order
>> to be compatible with the Python code and behaviour, but there's lots
>> of duplication; both the Python and the Haskell code will need to be
>> cleaned up and simplified (we don't need QFF_* at all).
>>
>> For now though, this implements QffTimestamp and associated code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Iustin Pop <ius...@google.com>
>> ---
>
> ping.



-- 
Guido Trotter
Ganeti engineering
Google Germany

Reply via email to