--- Alex Balk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > > >> We wouldn't have to have a release out the door without properly > >> testing it under most OS/archs. > >> > >> > > > > We did last time :-) And it works pretty well. Doing a 3.0.3 with > > apr-0.9.7 does not sound a big risk to me. > > > > > > Not to nitpick, but 3.0.2 was a minor bugfix version.
So will be 3.0.3. Not much new stuff, just bugfixes and a relatively minor upgrade to apr. > I hope your hunch about apr-0.9.7 is right, and peeking at 0.9.5 > seems to support that... We will see. I have a tarball ready and will upload it to my web-site later this evening. Stay tuned. > But someone has to play devil's advocate here. Better safe than sorry > - a beta 3.0.3 tested on major platforms could provide us with that > warm fuzzy "go ahead" feeling. > Definitely. I am not proposing to release 3.0.3 tomorrow. That would be foolish. I would not shoot for any date before end of March. Easter is more likely. Cheers Martin ------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de www: http://www.knobisoft.de
