On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 11:42 -0700, Bernard Li wrote: > Hi Jarod: > > Great - let's hope it gets accepted soon :-)
This has to be some sort of Fedora Extras record for shortest time waiting on acceptance. Its been approved, and is being built for the development tree as I type, with a branch for FC5 pending. No FC4 branch, unless there's a compelling argument for it -- might be possible if ganglia were to need a rebuild using it... > Marcus, is there a RPM for SUSE? There's a spec included in the confuse tarball that is heavily tailored for SUSE, so I'm guessing yes. > Stu, how about for Debian...? From what I can see, its available in Debian repos. > I believe it was mentioned that there is already one for Mandriva... Someone mentioned finding a v2.1 Mandriva package, which is quite ancient (even the latest, v2.5, is nearly 2 years old). > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jarod Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wed 16/08/2006 10:56 > To: Bernard Li > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse asshipped with > ganglia > > On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 10:43 -0700, Bernard Li wrote: > > Says 404 for me... > > Bah, what the heck, who broke the redirectors... Okay, full link, this > works, I promise: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202820 > > > > BTW, I don't suppose there'll be any chance for it to get into > > RHEL5...? > > Highly unlikely at this point in the game, barring it being requested > by > a (probably major) customer... > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of > > Jarod Wilson > > Sent: Wed 16/08/2006 09:28 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] apr, expat, confuse as shipped > > with ganglia > > > > On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 10:16 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > I can see about packaging the latest libconfuse for Fedora. > However, > > > without a special exception, it won't be built for FC4, as FC4 has > > > entered 'maintenance mode' (meaning generally nothing new gets > > built, > > > only fixes for existing packages allowed). > > > > > > [...time passes...] > > > > > > Almost there with a package that I think will pass Fedora Extras > > > muster... > > > > Just submitted it for Fedora Extras review: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/202820/ > -- Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
