On Monday 18 December 2006 19:38, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:55:29PM +0100, Erich Focht wrote:
> > On Monday 18 December 2006 11:28, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > >
> > >  no objections from my side. I am using it on several clusters without
> > > any serious problems.
> > 
> > any objections to changing the part_max_used metric to be limited to RW
> > partitions? If not, I'd like to check it in before you guys freeze a new
> > version...
> 
> I think the idea of changing that metric to mean only RW partitions is good,
> and probably matches better the intent of what was being monitored, and
> therefore have no objections.
> 
> but I think that in order to do it right and for consistency; we should do 
> that also in all other supported platforms; which means full platform
> regressions that could delay the current release;  which I though from the 
> original post from Bernard was in some sort of "code freeze".

So are you guys working on a branch of the svn tree dedicated to 3.0.4? I'd
like to fix the bug and consider it worthy even if it doesn't fix solaris
(since I don't know how to fix that). In the hope that the maintainers of the
non-Linux parts will do that some day...

If the release procedure involves freezing the main branch (trunk), when will
it be open again?

Thanks,
Erich


Reply via email to