On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 00:47, Steve Freitas wrote:
> Trying to keep too many options open can prevent one from taking
> advantage of any at all.
> 
> The Lisp community would benefit enormously if one implementation were
> the defacto open source standard, and I think we should choose one and
> put our efforts behind it.

Some people will want a small footprint, starts-fast implementation, bytecoded 
OK.  Others will not care about startup time as much as good native code 
compilation, robust threads, etc.  

How to please everyone with one implementation?

Magic 8-Ball says: "Concentrate and ask again."

:-)

--Patrick

_______________________________________________
Gardeners mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners

Reply via email to