Hi, Quoting Peter K.Lee (saint-jz+Qvnm4FdNWk0Htik3J/[EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I've put together a draft of the XML parser library comparison doc at: > > http://wiki.alu.org/XML_Parser_Libraries > > Not having *used* any of the libraries mentioned on this list, by no > means is the comparison authoritative. > > Most (if not all) of the verbiage came directly off the library > project pages.
* What does the "char-sets" column mean? It says "UTF-8 w/o Unicode" for cxml; I can't make sense of that. * I find the term "DOM" confusing as it is being used here. I know that CL-XML documentation uses it to refer to "a document object model", not "the (W3C) Document Object Model", but at least it explains that clearly. Note that CXML is the only implementation to actually support W3C DOM. * Somehow I'd like a column "Makes an effort to conform to the standards". AFAIK only CL-XML and CXML qualify for a "yes" there. * Perhaps the XML column could more clearly be named "implementation type" or something like that? Just my biased 2c, d. _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
