Ok. That will be good. There remain the second problem: what kind of hope do you have to get most implementors on board? And that includes the commercial ones?
I know I am nagging and negative. But that is just a reflection of the way things are. Cheers -- Marco On Jul 20, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Marco Monteiro wrote: > Marco Antoniotti wrote: >> First of all in the document that circulated there is no analysis of >> the "state of the art". > > I've been working on this, but the report is not ready yet. It is not > part of the specification; it is a separate document. I'll release it > this weekend, if I find time to finish it. Also, I'm missing some > pieces, like SCL documentation. I have just requested it. If someone in > the mailing list has some connection with Scieneer, and can help me get > access to the documentation, that would be really appreciated. > > Marco > _______________________________________________ > Gardeners mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners > _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
