Gregory Martin Pfeil wrote: > The Bordeaux-Threads spec/API is the objective. The portable > implementation is a stop-gap until there are native implementations > and fall-back if that doesn't happen. I guess that hasn't really been > explicit, but I figured it'd be better to build a usage base and let > that motivate the impl developers to build it in.
The document I have now is in somewhat better shape as a specification than what Bordeaux-Threads has. This weekend I'll make some changes to the API so that it is more "function compatible" with Bordeaux-Threads. Maybe we can then start to work together from there. Marco _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
