This topic sure has taken up a lot of time. Why not just fix it if
y'all don't like it the way it is?
Earlier I suggested that the analysis of this mystery gas might fit
into some numbering system, as is done with steel.
It seems to me that this group is the right one to do it.
One could at least deal with the top half dozen components, couldn't one?
Again, back to the steel analogy--- we don't have any problems talking
about A36, 1018, W1, etc..
Maybe, a letter for the top component?
Maybe a 2 tier system,; one for those gases with N2 and one for those
without?
Maybe someone could at least tell me why this shouldn't be done now?
Pete Stanaitis
--------------
_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list
to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]
to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org
for more Gasifiers, News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
