The major reason revegetation is vigorous after a burn forest or grass is from 
the reduction of fixed minerals to soluble by the oxidation. There is also a 
mineral concentration by  the reduction of the carbon.
Tom Taylor



-- Sent from my Palm Pixi
On Dec 17, 2011 8:26 PM, Mark Ludlow <[email protected]> wrote: 

Jeff and...There's a lot of different opinions on the value/harm of the "tars" 
in the soil. My instinct says "no-no!" but some people drink the distillate and 
think that it is God's blessing!If we observe natural phenomena, for instance 
forest burns (which, presumably, have multiple regimens of combustion, from 
hardly-at-all to pure ash) we see that there is usually a strong recovery after 
a burn, but the ecosystems are usually not replaced, intact, but forced to 
begin their long, progressive cycle once again.A study of 19th-century charcoal 
kilns in the Eastern U.S., show that there is a lasting effect on the sites on 
which they were located. On the other hand, many suggest that the aromatic 
compounds produced during pyrolytic combustion are valuable components of the 
signaling network that tells seeds and the soil ecosystem that the sky has 
opened and that the system has an altered competitive structure.Maybe a little 
is good; and a lot is bad. But despite the evidence that many of the 
polyaromatic hydrocarbons remaining in the char produced for biochar 
applications is carcinogenic, some certifying bodies have declared it "Organic" 
and suitable for unrestricted use in agricultural applications.Who knows?Best, 
Mark -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Davis
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 6:18 PM
To: Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification
Subject: Re: [Gasification] gasifier type updarft use rice husk Dear 
Tom, On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 09:43 -0500, Thomas Reed wrote:>  
including an open PYROMID, and any junk biomass, we all have easy > access 
to as much charcoal as we could ever need, for the first time > in 
history. This summer I tried numerous switchgrass bale PYROMID's with no 
practical charcoal production but it did make some impressive and scary fires. 
Personally I would be reluctant to promote this just because of the danger of 
starting forest fires and what not.   > So we really have no 
excuse for cleaning up TLUD gas if we wish to.   As long as we don't 
place the tar laden charcoal in the soil but use it as a fuel. In other words 
clean charcoal added into the soil is much better that adding charcoal that was 
used to filter toxic waste.    > Compare to natural gas at 
1000 Btu/ scf.  Locally the troops have landed and marcellus shale gas is 
under production. It's been stated that this type of well will last for 30 to50 
years and beneath that even more gas. Already, locally, the price of natural 
gas has dropped.  Best 
regards,  Jeff  _______________________________________________Gasification
 mailing list to Send a Message to the list, use the email address 
[email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List 
Settings use the web page 
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org for
 more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web 
site:http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/
_______________________________________________
Gasification mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Gasifiers,  News and Information see our web site:
http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to