On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Mike Burden wrote:
> I think that the person that posted the question
> mentioned that some sites would be connected by
> DSL. I haven't done a lot of research into it,
> but I think most DSL providers are still offering
> static IP addresses.
I'd say that depends on the type of account. A large number of providers
prefer to deploy dynamic addresses for residential xDSL...those that dont
are generally very small and havent realized the scale problems associated
with static addressing (for low end/low cost service).
BUT! If you're talking about business class xDSL, then yes. Static IP
addressing is pretty much a standard..ranging from a single IP to an
appropriate sized subnet.
> where it fits the budget) or reduce the number
> of GBLs that might have to be managed in the
> event of an IP change.
Now, excuse my ignorance on this subject..but there is only one way to
find out. :)
John was suggesting, I think, that instead of using the GBL w/ VPN option
at the dynamic sites, to instead put a GBL at the site, and a VPN client
on each end-user PC. (the PC would handle the VPN, not the GBL...the PC
VPN client can support the dynamic addresses, from what I understand.)
Of course, the VPN-on-PC option doesnt scale far...it would be a lot of
work for a dozen or two users at a site. But for 1 to 2 users, it
shouldnt be a problem at all...
DISCLAIMER: I only work here, and am learning the product line slowly. Do
listen to my suggestions with that in mind.
...david
---
David Raistrick
Systems Administrator - Global Technology Associates, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
