None taken!
I was resisting the temptation to poke fun at Wankwood cos of the bollocking
I get with my name!

Still having no luck with the VPN to BEFSX41 with dynamic ip (trying to keep
this thread on track...)
Glad to hear that Alex is getting a cheap and effective VPN solution
organised.

Hamish

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 27 February 2003 3:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [gb-users] VPN between BEFSX41 + GB-1000


Hamish Cant and [EMAIL PROTECTED] !.. I bet that had a few of the British
members giggling a bit, no offense guys.

Anyway just a note to say thanks to the many that replied to me re: VPN over
DSL problem, including timeouts and general wierd things happening,

As it turns out, it would appear to be an incompatibility between the cheapy
BT Voyager router we were using and the gnatbox, after replacing with a
cisco,
all the problems disappeared. Even wierder was that we had a pptp tunnel
running over the GB's and voyager without any problem at all.

Does anyone else have gb's and voyagers running a gb 2 gb VPN working?

Anyway, would also like to thank all at GSEC/Ellipse for all their help
during
this rather annoying issue, if it happens again, we'll be looking a little
harder at the routers, and not your boxes.

Many Thanks,

Richard Stevens

Systems Engineer,
TCC

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest version first unsubscribe, then
 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive of the last 1000 messages:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Important Notice. 
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of the message to such person) you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone. In such case you should destroy this message and kindly notify the
sender by reply email. 
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of Bates Smart shall be understood as
neither given or endorsed by it. 
In no event shall Bates Smart, its employees, contractors or any associates
be liable for specific, indirect, or consequential damage or loss arising
from negligence or otherwise, which may occur through transmission of the
message and attachments.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest version first unsubscribe, then
 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive of the last 1000 messages:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to