https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123976
--- Comment #38 from Sergey Fedorov <vital.had at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Peter Dyballa from comment #36) > (In reply to Sergey Fedorov from comment #34) > > > > Yes (`port deactivate active` will do). > > I would need some exceptions from that: port is running in GNU Emacs which > depends on some ports, the coreutils are needed, could be diff and patch, > X11, Xserver, X window managers… > > Apple's Terminal is no alternative. Why though? I can't really think of a reason why gcc build should need all that, on any system.
